Demographics and population dynamics of Northern Recovery Unit loggerhead turtles via genetic tagging
Breanna Ondich
Marine turtles are difficult to directly study due to their complex life cycles and extensive movements. Females must come ashore to nest, so most marine turtle population monitoring globally consists of nest surveys. However, translating these counts into meaningful female abundance estimates requires individual fecundity data. Traditionally, these individual nesting histories have been by projects that patrol beaches each night during nesting season, applying flipper and PIT tags after the female has successfully nested or aborted her nesting attempt. However, it’s difficult to access all nesting habitats on a particular beach throughout the tidal cycle, and a significant proportion of females may use multiple beaches for nesting. These challenges often result in a majority of females being detected only a single time, with partial nesting histories potentially biasing important vital rates.
In 2005, an astute technician on Little Cumberland Island, Georgia had the foresight to freeze eggshells from a depredated loggerhead turtle (Caretta caretta) nest where the nesting female had evaded detection and ask whether we could match it to their tagged females. Thus, the idea of getting tagging (using clutch sampling and microsatellite genotyping as a means of identifying individuals without the need to physically intercept them) was “hatched.” Following pilot study testing in 2006, we began genetic tagging statewide in Georgia in 2008. Subpopulation-wide sampling encompassing the Northern Recovery Unit nesting habitats in Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia, and Maryland commenced in 2010. A few counties in northeastern Florida were added in 2016 to provide resighting data.
To date, this project has identified over 13,000 unique nesting females. We are using the individual nesting history data to address several questions related to the demographics and population dynamics of this subpopulation. This work would not be possible without tremendous staff support of the state sea turtle programs and enthusiastic participation of more than 90 nesting survey projects conducted by NGO groups as well as volunteers and staff representing municipal, state and federal agencies that cover approximately 1,000 km of beaches from Florida to Maryland.
Focal objectives include:
Abundance estimation
Characterizing reproductive parameters: clutch frequency and remigration intervals
Recruitment and survival
Variation in nest site fidelity and nest site selection
Characterizing the scale of natal homing
Collaborators
Georgia Department of Natural Resources Sea Turtle Conservation Program
Mark Dodd, Ashley Raybould
The Georgia Sea Turtle Cooperative
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources Marine Turtle Conservation Program
Michelle Pate, Charlotte Hope, Jeffrey Schwenter
South Carolina sea turtle monitoring network
North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission
Dr. Matthew Godfrey, Sarah Finn
North Carolina Sea Turtle Project
Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources
Ruth Boettcher
The Virginia sea turtle monitoring network
Assateague National Seashore
Tami Pearl
Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Dr. Simona Ceriani
Caretta Research Project
Dr. Joseph Pfaller
Kristina Williams
Georgia Sea Turtle Center
Bald Head Island Conservancy
Dr. Elizabeth Darrow
Paul Hillbrand
Recruitment of in-water juveniles into the breeding population
South Carolina Department of Natural Resources - Marine Resources Division
Dr. Michael Arendt
School of Earth, Ocean & Environment, University of South Carolina
Dr. Joseph Quattro
Dr. Kathryn Levasseur
Breanna Ondich
The South Carolina Department of Natural Resources in partnership with the UGA Marine Extension Service/Sea Grant recently concluded a 21-year (2000 to 2021), NMFS-funded sea turtle research trawl that captured >2,500 loggerhead turtles in the central South Atlantic Bight (SAB). Capture location coupled with lesser amounts of recapture/re-sighting data and telemetry tracks support annual fidelity to the survey area. Demographically, only 15% of captured loggerhead sea turtles were considered adults based on published size-at-age data, but genetic haplotypes indicate regional origin in relative proximity to foraging grounds and nearly three times as many females as males. Independent of size, less than 5% of tagged loggerhead sea turtles were recaptured following release but occurred up to 15 years later, consistent with high annual survival rates required for population stability. Unfortunately, given only four nighttime tagging projects across the Northern Recovery Unit (NRU) subpopulation and only slightly more for the larger Peninsula Recovery Unit (PRU) in Florida, there are few opportunities to physically recapture these individuals that will likely nest in this region eventually. This suggestion is supported by the re-sighting of two formerly juvenile loggerhead sea turtles captured in the trawl survey on PRU and NRU nesting beaches 13 to 14 years later, respectively. Therefore, in 2020 we initiated a pilot study to use genotype data to search for additional instances of recruitment into the adult segment of this population, for which a decade of nesting beach reference data exists for the NRU. Any “hits” from this close-kin mark-recapture approach to identify first order relatives (i.e., siblings and parent-offspring pairs) will provide valuable temporal and spatial context on the recruitment process in a study system where juveniles have been historically been under represented due to logistical constraints.
Carry-over effects of foraging site choice on reproduction
Florida Fish and Wildlife Research Institute
Dr. Simona Ceriani
Archie Carr Center for Sea Turtle Research, University of Florida
Dr. Karen Bjorndal
Dr. Hannah Vander Zanden
Caretta Research Project
Dr. Joseph Pfaller
Kristina Williams
Laurence Fusco
Satellite tracks have indicated that most loggerhead turtles nesting on Northern Recovery Unit beaches have foraging home ranges in the Mid-Atlantic Bight, South Atlantic Bight, or in the Subtropical Northwest Atlantic. However, the expense and logistics of satellite telemetry limits sample sizes and sampling locations. Our partners have developed techniques to assign nesting females to these three major foraging areas using the stable isotope signatures derived from skin or egg yolks. We’re incorporating these foraging ground assignments into demographic analyses to test whether and how foraging site choice affects reproduction.